Your AI went live. Who's checking it now?
Most consultancies leave once deployment is done. CLEARANCE is the post-deployment check they don't provide: point-in-time diagnostic evidence you can hand to your board, your insurer, or a regulator.
"No named accountable individual for the AI decision system." Mapped to SM&CR Senior Managers Regime, FCA Principle 3.
Same input. Same output. Every time.
Ask a general AI chat tool the same governance question twice and you can get two different answers. Different wording. Different confidence. Sometimes a different conclusion. That's fine for a quick first impression. It's not fine for something you hand to a regulator. CLEARANCE checks your answers against a fixed set of rules, not a model writing fresh text each time. Try it below. Same input, run twice on each side.
Same question, asked three different ways by a general AI chat tool. All three sound plausible. None names the rule behind it, none is reproducible, and none would survive a regulator asking "show me how you got that." A CLEARANCE finding is a lookup against a fixed set of rules. It comes back the same, with the rule it's based on, every single time.
"Why can't I just ask ChatGPT or Claude to do this for free?"
You can ask, and you might get something useful back. But ask twice and you can get two different answers, with no way to check either one. There is nothing to show a regulator if they ask how you got that answer. CLEARANCE gives you the same answer every time, tells you exactly which rule it's based on, and hands you a report built to be checked. That is what you are paying for. Not an answer. Proof behind the answer.
This is what one finding looks like.
FS-G04 · No named SM&CR accountable individual for AI decision system
This becomes visible when: the FCA opens a supervision visit and asks who is accountable for AI decisions affecting clients. No named Senior Manager in a Statement of Responsibilities. The gap exists and is provable from your own governance documents. No incident required.
Required action: update the relevant Statement of Responsibilities. Name the accountable Senior Manager. Document the oversight protocol. Add AI systems to the Management Responsibilities Map.
This is not a consultant's opinion. It is a deterministic finding derived from intake signals against a fixed gap library. The same inputs produce this finding on every run. Every finding in a CLEARANCE report follows this structure: gap ID, regulatory obligation, the moment it becomes visible, and the action that closes it.
Built for regulated organisations.
Each sector maps to the obligations that apply: UK regulatory frameworks, the EU AI Act, HIPAA, and sector-specific rules. The engine determines which gaps apply to your deployment.
Three steps from intake to evidence artefact.
Complete the assessment
A structured intake covering your AI deployment, decision points, autonomy boundaries, and data flows. Ten minutes. One question at a time. No technical knowledge required.
The engine runs
Your responses are evaluated against a fixed gap library. No consultant interpretation. No maturity scoring. The same inputs produce the same findings on every run. Deterministic by design.
Report delivered
A four-section PDF delivered to your inbox within minutes of payment. Executive summary, detailed findings, remediation roadmap, evidence appendix. Built to be handed to a board, insurer, or regulator unchanged.
A fixed-scope diagnostic. One engagement. One report.
- Deterministic findings. Same inputs, same findings, every time.
- Fixed fee. Priced by sector. Shown before you pay.
- Report delivered within minutes. No follow-up call required.
- Defensible to your board, insurer, and regulator.
Not a retainer. Not advice. Not a platform.
- We do not build or fix your AI systems.
- We do not provide legal advice.
- We do not offer retainers or ongoing relationships.
- We do not consult beyond the fixed scope of one engagement.
Three ways to find out where your gaps are.
| CLEARANCE | Traditional GRC consulting | Generic AI chat tool | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time to result | Minutes, same day | Days to weeks of engagement | Instant, but unverified |
| Price | Fixed, shown before you pay | Scoped and quoted per engagement, often five figures | Free or low-cost, no accountability behind it |
| Consistency | Same input produces the same finding, every run | Varies by consultant, day, and interpretation | Wording and conclusions can shift between runs |
| Regulatory mapping | Every finding mapped to a named obligation | Depends on the individual consultant's knowledge | General knowledge, not verified against current obligations |
| Evidence trail | Evidence appendix included as standard | Sometimes available, often at extra cost | No audit trail behind the answer |
| Ongoing commitment | None. One engagement, one report | Often structured as a retainer | None, but no structured deliverable either |
Before you buy.
Walk into the next board meeting, insurer call, or regulator visit with an answer ready. Not an excuse.
One engagement. One report. Fixed fee, priced by sector, delivered within minutes of payment.
Start free check